Research project title: Population health and climate science: overlaps, interactions, and communal benefits of their integration
Abstract: In my PhD project I work on some related questions in philosophy of medicine, philosophy of climate science, and general philosophy of science, such as:
1. What uncertainty and inductive risk are, and how to manage them, in population health and climate sciences?
2. Should we embed some considerations from population health in our reasoning about climate, through approaches such as Health in All Policies, Planetary Health, or One Health?
3. Which is the legitimate role for non-epistemic (social, moral, political) values in population health and climate science?
4. Can a better understanding of this role help build trust in science and enhance our communication of scientific findings?
To tackle these questions with an interdisciplinary approach, I am collaborating with philosophers of medicine, epidemiologists and physicians from PhilHead – Italian Network for Philosophy of Health and Disease – and climate scientists from ItaliaMeteo, the Italian National Agency for Meteorology and Climatology, where I am currently doing a research internship. In my thesis, I will argue for joint philosophical treatment of some issues from the fields of population health and climate sciences. I will start by tackling some issues concerning the role and legitimacy of non-epistemic values in population health research and policies. I will then focus on some issues in climate modeling, such as the management of uncertainty and the relationship between climate services providers and users. I will then discuss some foundational issues in philosophy of science such as the legitimate role for non-epistemic values, I will identify some criteria for their legitimate use in population health and climate sciences, and I will argue that there are substantial benefits in integrating considerations from population health into climate change scientific research and policies.